I just wish Dr. Peter May would show some intelligence in his rants-- he has been calling for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney for some time now-- as though impeachment would remove them from office----anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of the Constitution would know that impeachment does not remove anyone from office-- unless they are sunsequently convicted of impeachment charges by 2/3 of the US Senate-- with the Chief Justice presiding--Dr. May has been bandying his ignorance around for months in various local media----I guess he must have been one of those children left behind---Pic is not off on the hate issues-- a local person told me that in a confrontation that he had with Dr. May-- Dr. May- said that he HATED George Bush-----let us not forget that Democrats voted for the war in Iraq-- and not only the Patriot Act but its most recent and more expanded reincarnation---what does that say??? we have some pretty gullible and just plain stupid Democratic legislators in the US Congress---no wonder Congress' approval ratings are lower the the President's---chbpod
 

House vote on Iraq Resolution, 10/10/2002:

Democrats Yea: 81
Democrats Nay: 126

Republicans Yea: 215
Republicans Nay: 6


And in regards to Dr. May, I have spoken with him and he is perfectly aware of the constitutional process that requires a trial in the Senate. He understands that impeachment is simply the indictment.

And, yes, Peter has said he hates Bush, but somehow I doubt that his utterance hurts the United States's world standing. Somehow I think our policies have much more to do with it.
 

Well Greg I also so doubt that Peter May's condemnation of Bush Chaney has had any impact on US standing in the world--BUT if you say that he fully understands the Constitutional process-- why is he sending in such stupid- and ignorant letters to the editor--time after time----he either knows the process or he doesn't-- and nothing he has published in the public aquare has ever indicated such knowledge----all it would take is a simple sentence or two--- to make his call for the removal of Bush and Cheney-- sound intelligent-- at least process-wise--- but as he (already having to you acknooedeged the process) he continues to look like an absolute BOOB--- in the public square-----if he knows the process-- and doesn;t address it-- then he's an even bigger moron than I thought he was---I thought he was just uneducated--at least in history and government---now I know he's an idiot----would someone please tell this moron to add a couple of sentences tohis rants----you know he blasts all Congressmen- for their failure to impeach---well Kennedy and Kerry are not a party to that------I agree with Peter---if you have a case- go ahead and do it---stop whistling in the wind--or past graveyards----maybe he should say that since Olver has not responded-- he should not be voted for next year---- let Peter May put his mouth where it should be---if Bush and Cheney are the "fault" of the election system-- and there are constitutional remedies provided for the House and ultimately - possibly - the Senate---why isn;t he REALLY going after them---as far as "local" officials---what the hell can we do---make a statement---he's doing a good enough job in making stupid statements without our help---chbpod
 

Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of the constitution would know that impeachment is the only course open for the removal of a sitting President or Vice-President. What else is Dr. May going to call for?
As for saying out loud that you hate the president, there ain't nothing more American.
Anyone with a rudimentary knowldge of the Constitutional Amendments would know that.
 

I am not disputing his right to hate the President and the entire administration---as far as "rudimentary" knowledge of the Constitution-- May has never demonstrated that--- he calls for impeachment and everything he has every written implies that that is sufficient for removal from office----impeachement is to most people- tantamount to removal from office----stop sheltering a buffoon--- let him make it clear---his intent and the process------and trust me I have more than a rudimentary knowledge of the amendments--- of course I also have more than a rudimentary knowledge of the Constitution-- without the wmendments--- and removal from office must follow a set procedure as prescribed in that Constitution--- and May has absolutely unequivocally shown publically no understanding of that---his personal testimony to Greg notwithstanding-------he simply believes he is right on ALL accounts and doesn;t want to be challenged--- and reveal his ignorance---- which he may now understand-----but such an admission would undermine his credibility as posted in his previous letters to the editor--he was wrong then-- could it be he is wrong now????? I am only concerned with "process" at this time-- --his ranst lead the uninformed public to believe that impeachment is "removal" from office-- he has plenty of opportunites to suggest that we start the "process"-- for removal- which entails the trial in the Senate-- he has never done that------he is as guilty of misleading the local public as he claims Bush was on WMD's--- chbpod